It won't be reported but The Federal Income
Tax Officially DIED today (3/27/2007) at
13:53:58 PDT
Supreme Law Firm <
paulandrewmitchell2004@yahoo.com> wrote:
Subject: RIP: The Federal Income Tax
Officially DIED today (3/27/2007) at 13:53:58
PDT
My Fellow Americans:
We bring you tidings of great joy.
That was the date and time stamp on
our Sales Receipt from the U.S. Postal Service
at downtown
San Diego, California, USA, at the very moment we posted this
NOTICE OF DEFAULT:
INTERVENOR'S NOTICE OF DEFAULT, BY AFFIDAVIT;
AND, SIXTH NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR MANDATORY
JUDICIAL NOTICE (Tenth Circuit #07-2017)
here:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/nad06.htm
FINALLY, the federal income tax is officially
dead.
=============================================
HERE IT IS FURTHER EXPLAINED IN LAYMAN'S
TERMS
What is the significance of all of this in
regards to the IRS??? I'm not sure
what is going on, but it sounds pretty big
what is happening in regards to these people
not answering you.I have some other communication
about a Chuck Conces who is having
some troubles and wonder if this might be
of import to what is happening to him.
Yes: this news is significant for all
300 million Americans, particularly as the
annual April 15 tax deadline approaches.
There is no liability STATUTE for
taxes imposed by subtitle A of the Internal
Revenue Code: IRS tried to create that
liability with regulations instead, but it's
not legal for IRS to do that:
http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/nutshell.htm An administrative regulation
is NOT an "Act of Congress":
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/1/101.html (defines "Act of Congress")
Regulations are written and promulgated by
Executive Branch agencies, NOT by the Congress
of the
United States i.e. the Legislative Branch. Only the Congress
can "make federal laws":
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#1 EVEN IF IRS were a de jure service
or bureau within the U.S. Department of the
Treasury (which they are not), they would
STILL not have any authority to create a
tax liability by means of regulations published
in the Federal Register.
So, in point of fact, IRS has been impersonating
the Congress and impersonating the U.S. Department
of the Treasury. These are violations of
18 USC 912 and 31 USC 333, respectively:
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/912.html (felony federal offense);
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/31/333.html (civil and criminal penalties)
And, since Treasury fell silent in response
to a proper SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE, they
were legally estopped the moment we
filed a NOTICE OF DEFAULT, BY AFFIDAVIT at
the Tenth Circuit today. Service of
LEGAL MAIL is effected on the day it's posted.
"Estoppel" basically means that
they cannot come forward any longer, because
they had their chance, for several
years, and they couldn't produce a STATUTE.
So, now it's O-V-E-R for them.
EVEN IF they produced a liability STATUTE
tomorrow, that STATUTE (which doesn't exist,
by the way) can be stricken from evidence
at the Tenth Circuit on the basis of legal
estoppel. In simple language, they
cannot change their minds to the detriment
of their opposing party(s):
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/informal.opening.brief.htm
For the rest of the story, study up on the
topic of "estoppel" in any good
law dictionary e.g. "equitable estoppel"
and "collateral estoppel". Not
only is the U.S. Department of the Treasury
legally estopped. U.S. DOJ attempted
to appear on behalf of a Delaware corporation
which has been revoked. Therefore,
the U.S. Department of Justice is also legally
estopped from enforcing IRC subtitle A and from
attempting to rebut the AFFIDAVIT above,
because the Relator in that appeal preempted
DOJ the moment Relator appeared
on behalf of the
United States ex rel:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/intervention.htm
It is now the official position of the United
States (federal government) that there is
no federal Statute at Large which
creates a specific liability for income taxes
imposed by subtitle A of the Internal Revenue
Code. For standing high Court authority,
see Commissioner v. Acker:
http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/2amjur2d.htm (see Am Jur abstract!)
Moreover, U.S. DOJ cannot now attempt to
appear on behalf of the United States (federal
government), because the
United States is already legally represented in that appeal:
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
IT'S OVER, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN -- FINALLY!
PLEASE TELL EVERYONE YOU KNOW THIS GOOD NEWS:
THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX OFFICIALLY DIED TODAY
AT 1:53 P.M. PACIFIC DAYLIGHT TIME.
Praise God for all of His many blessings
during the past 17 years.
==============================================
Supreme Law Firm paulandrewmitchell2
004@yahoo.com wrote:
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2
004@yahoo. com>
Subject: legal estoppel is now activated
against U.S. Department of the Treasury
To:
recticuli@yahoo.com
INTERVENOR'S NOTICE OF DEFAULT, BY AFFIDAVIT;
AND,SIXTH NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR MANDATORY
JUDICIAL NOTICE (Tenth Circuit #07-2017):
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/nad06.htm See item (7).
This pleading was mailed yesterday (see PROOF
OF SERVICE). A second such NOTICE OF
DEFAULT, BY AFFIDAVIT was mailed today:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/nad07.htm
PASS IT ON, PLEASE!
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul
Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator
and Federal Witness:
18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm